Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 00:28

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Does anybody believe in cultural appropriation?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Your daily horoscope: June 17, 2025 - The Globe and Mail
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Space Force demos rapid turnaround on latest GPS III launch - Defense News
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Why did my ex move on so fast, we have only been broken up for 2 weeks?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Non distinctio minus inventore tempora repudiandae mollitia.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What is the best sex you have ever had (in detail)?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Firefly's Blue Ghost On Moon Seen By Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter - MSN